This past Tuesday, Governor Tim Walz and Senator JD Vance went head to head in front of America for the vice presidential debate. In contrast to previous debates during this election season, both candidates focused on discussing policy and veered away from unrelated topics. 

          Prompted by moderators Norah O’Donnell and Margaret Brennan of CBS News, the candidates answered questions on conflict in the Middle East, climate change, immigration, health care, and economy. With the exception of one microphone muting, both candidates remained mostly respectful of the time given to their opponent. 

          So – what should be taken away from this debate?

          In terms of policy plans, Walz and Vance did not reveal anything too surprising, with all of their points having been previously established by their respective running mates and parties. For the most part Vance took a more conservative stance on issues whereas Walz had more liberal views, which was expected.

          The debate was fairly tepid, with the general consensus being that the debate ended in a draw. Mr. Jacobsen, a history teacher here at West Morris Central stated “both candidates came across as likable and put forth their visions fairly clearly . . . both candidates did a good job of trying to help themselves.”  He also mentioned that it is important to note that the Vice Presidential debate usually does not have that much influence on election results. 

          Moreover, another teacher in WMC’s history department, Mr. Nicolosi, stated “I don’t know if there was a clear winner, they both accomplished what they set out to do.” When asked whether or not he thought the candidates helped or hurt their cases, he commented “I think it’s going to be absolutely neutral.”

          Although there were not many surprising highlights from the debate, a quotable moment came from Brennan, one of the previously mentioned moderators. While in the midst of arguing, the candidate’s microphones were cut. Brennan effectively ended the squabble, saying “Gentlemen, the audience can’t hear you because the mics are cut.” The debate proceeded on topic following this comment.

          Overall, the debate was well organized but not very revealing of any new plans or ideas. Both sides reiterated their established plans for their potential vice presidency and effectively discussed the issues that were brought up. Although the vice presidential debate is not extremely critical to a candidates election, it still provided the American public with the overall plans both parties have should they be elected.